Court Decision Perpetuates Fodder in Mumia Case

The Legal Intelligencer reported online today that Mumia Abu-Jamal’s death sentence has been overturned but his conviction upheld.

Shannon Duffy reported that the “3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s ruling that affirmed Abu-Jamal’s conviction but overturned his death sentence due to potentially confusing jury instructions.”

 It doesn’t surprise me at all that the opinion was 118 pages (36 pages short of the 154-page PCRA opinion that I worked on with Judge Albert F. Sabo as his law clerk in 1995) or that the three-judge panel was divided.

 Having read more that 10,000 pages of transcripts when we heard the PCRA matters in 1995, I personally believe that the appellate claims are meritless.

What really irks me, though, is that this case, some 26 years later, is still unresolved. The evidence clearly shows that Abu-Jamal murdered Officer Daniel Faulkner in cold blood. If he had just gotten life in prison at the original trial, I doubt he would have ever become a cause celebre. Let’s face it, Pennsylvania may claim to be a capital punishment state but getting the death penalty is no different than life in prison.

 The death penalty, as with this decision, just gives rise to plenty of fodder for the media, continues to keep the case alive and perpetuates the injustice to the Faulkner family.

 In the book, “Murdered by Mumia,” co-authored by Michael Smerconish and Maureen Faulkner, Maureen remembers the day Judge Yohn overturned the death sentence. She says that she received a call from “Hugh Burns of the District Attorney’s Office in Philadelphia. He had news that would drain the blood from [her] face. . . [she] felt sick … [then] the phones started ringing from reporters.” 

 I presume, seven years after Judge Yohn’s decision, Maureen Faulkner is experiencing much of the same. So the saga continues.

Gina F. Rubel, Esq.
Furia Rubel Communications, Inc.

Explore posts in the same categories: Gina F. Rubel, Media and Law

3 Comments on “Court Decision Perpetuates Fodder in Mumia Case”

  1. Glenn Manko Says:

    Ms. Rubel is very much on point and the real injustice is that society will put personalities before principles and a murderer can become a celebrity…mocking the judicial system (can somebody say O.J.?).

  2. David C. Federman Says:

    Our societal thirst for vengeance via the death penalty is the only reason this case continues to matter to anyone. As Ms. Rubel correctly points out, if there were no death penalty (e.g. New Jersey recently quietly eliminated the death penalty) , Abu- Jamal would have been locked away for the rest of his life and we would not be talking about him. Although I certainly empathize with the tragic and senseless loss of Ms. Faulkner’s husband, killing Mumia will not bring him back and although it might give her a measure of revenge, thankfully, vengeance is not and should not be a part of our system of criminal justice.

  3. Samuel Says:

    Muito bom o site, gostaria de propor uma troca de links como parceiros, meu site é o , valeu.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: