Fattah’s Planned Appeal of Campaign Contribution Limits Under Fire

Just hours after the Commonwealth Court upheld the constitutionality of Philadelphia’s campaign finance ordinance, U.S. Rep. — and mayoral candidate — Chaka Fattah said he planned to appeal.

With that annoucement comes its critics. The Committee of Seventy, a political watchdog group that filed an amicus curiae in support of upholding the contribution limits, denounced the planned appeal yesterday.

The group’s president, Zack Stalberg, said the organization hoped the state Supreme Court would refuse to hear the case. If the case does to go up to the high court, Stalberg said the Committee would file another amicus brief.

“The Commonwealth Court was resolute in its determination that Philadelphia has every right to enact campaign contribution limits,” Stalberg said. “To discard contribution limits would invite a return to the very pay-to-play culture that the city’s ordinance was specifically designed to end.

He said the removal of the limits so close to the May 15 primary would result in a “fundraising frenzy.”

“Given the municipal scandals this town has endured, it is unfortunate that some candidates continue to believe that they need to raise unlimited sums of money in order to win the election,” Stalberg said. “I wish that allowing a wealthy candidate to spend his own money was not constitutionally permissible, but it is,” he said, referring to millionaire mayoral candidate Tom Knox.

The Commonwealth Court’s ruling puts back in place the $5,000 campaign contribution limit for individuals and a $20,000 limit for businesses or political action committees. It is believed that all of the candidates had been following those limits even though a Philadelphia Common Pleas judge ruled in December 2006 that the ordinance was unconstitutional. ~Gina Passarella, Staff Reporter

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Politics

One Comment on “Fattah’s Planned Appeal of Campaign Contribution Limits Under Fire”


  1. Although this ruling violates free market principles, which I am generally in support of, I think it is the right ruling. With this city’s history of fraudulent players, a contribution cap will help level the playing field and get people to look harder at the critical issues instead of simply voting for someone b/c they’ve seen that candidate’s expensive tv commercial a hundred times. Image is important for this city, and this ruling sends a message that we’re tired of the pay to play nonsense.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: